Frequently Asking Questions (FAQs)

What is PPP?
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) refers to an arrangement between a government, statutory entity, or government-owned entity on one side, and a private sector entity on the other, for the provision of public assets and/or public services through investments made and/or management undertaken by the private sector entity for a specified period of time. There is a well-defined allocation of risk between the private sector and the public entity, and the chosen private entity, based on open competitive bidding, receives performance-linked payments that conform to or are benchmarked against specified and predetermined performance standards, measurable by the public entity or its representative.

How do PPPs work?
The private sector assumes responsibility for all or many phases of a project’s life cycle, making it the majority bearer of risk. The private sector partner is fully accountable for the project’s success and has an incentive to achieve the most effective outcome over its lifespan. Issues related to poor design, construction, and inadequate maintenance become the responsibility of the private sector. The private sector partner is judged and compensated purely based on performance, ensuring financial incentives for on-time and within-budget project completion. Additionally, the private sector partner must raise significant financing for the asset’s construction. Lenders and equity participants provide a level of due diligence and oversight that brings discipline to the process. The government specifies its requirements in terms of services provided and leaves as much scope as possible for the private sector partner to propose the best solution.

  • What are the benefits of PPPs?
  • PPPs introduce private sector financing, technology, and innovation, and provide better public services through improved efficiency.
  • PPPs create budgetary certainty by setting the present and future costs of projects.
  • PPPs help develop local private sector capabilities through joint ventures with large international firms, as well as subcontracting opportunities for local firms in various support functions.
  • PPPs are a method of gradually exposing government services to increasing levels of private sector participation in a responsible manner.
  • PPPs can result in a more efficient use of limited public sector resources.
  • Because many projects rely on upfront capital from the private sector, they can proceed at times when public capital may be constrained, either by public spending limits or budget cycles.
  • By allocating the responsibility for design and construction to the private sector, there is a stronger incentive for the private sector to deliver projects within shorter timeframes.
  • Risk is allocated to the party best able to manage it at the least cost.
  • Private sector partners are sometimes capable of generating additional revenue from third parties, offsetting costs for the public sector.
  • Public sector officials are free to focus on service planning and performance monitoring instead of the day-to-day management of public services. This allows the public sector to maintain a long-term perspective in planning and budget-setting.
  • The government can require that essential social protections be incorporated into a project. These can take the form of quality standards, such as the frequency of services to be provided, and safety criteria. It can also specify that projects be tailored to the specific needs of local communities.


What are the disadvantages of PPPs?

  • Sometimes, individual PPP projects require a longer preparation time, such as a PPP initial MOU, PPP Facility Agreement, approval by lawyers, registration, insurance of the project, and funds arrangement/allocation. These processes may take many months, depending on the size of the project and the quality standards.
  • In most cases, the PPP facilitator covers all necessary expenses from their own budget, but if the project owner fails to fulfill the requirements or conditions of the contract, the facilitator faces a huge loss of time and money as a result.
  • Sometimes, the PPP facilitator starts the project, but due to new government policies, the project declines, causing the private party to face a significant loss.
  • Some projects may be more politically or socially challenging to introduce and implement than others. The private sector is averse to excessive risk and is cautious about accepting risks beyond their control. Acceptance of risks will be reflected in prices, and private sector partners may also demand a significant level of control over operations in exchange for accepting high risks.
  • While the private sector partner is responsible for construction and, in some cases, for service delivery, citizens will still hold the government accountable for quality and cost.
  • PPPs are often long-term and complex, making it difficult to foresee all possible contingencies at the signing of a contract. Contracts may need to be renegotiated over time, and the government must be prepared for this contingency.

What are types of PPP Contracts and Agreements?

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) can take a wide range of forms, varying in the degree of purpose, involvement of the private entity, legal structure, and risk-sharing. A PPP is generally memorialized in a contract or agreement to outline the responsibilities of each party and clearly allocate risk. The broad contractual forms, as covered by existing policy, include:

  • Non-recourse project funding,
  • Non-interest-bearing investment in commercial projects,
  • Infrastructure development,
  • Government social project funding against a ‘ sovereign guarantee, ‘
  • Government mega project funding against bank securities,
  • Service contracts,
  • Management contracts,
  • Leasing contracts ,
  • Concession contracts,
  • Build, operate, transfer (BOT),
  • Build, own, operate, transfer (BOOT),
  • Build, own, operate (BOO) ,
  • Engineering procurement, construction, and finance (EPCF) ,
  • Bank instruments trade services,
  • Bank securities sale, purchase, and utilization,
  • Project funding, financing, and investment,
  • Project funding against bank guarantees services ,
  • Subsidy services in strategic goods ,
  • Support in import and export and general trading,
  • Urban development contracts,
  • Agriculture and water management.

DBFOT/BOT:
The most common form of PPP used is one where the private sector operator designs, builds, finances, owns, and manages the facility, operating it commercially for the concession period, after which the facility is transferred to the authority. In this case , legal ownership of the asset vests with the public sector when the concession period ends. The most common form of a BOT project is a toll road project.


Operations & Maintenance (Service contract):
The government bids out the right to deliver a specific service or assigns part of the undertaking to the private sector for the operations and maintenance of the assets. Such contracts are normally of a shorter duration than concession contracts.


Lease, Develop, Operate, and Maintain (a variation of BOT):
Assets are leased to the private sector under specific terms to operate and maintain the assets for the term of the concession period.


What is the difference between outsourcing, privatization, and PPPs?
Unlike outsourcing, a PPP assigns the private sector partner substantial risk, the responsibility for financing a project’s capital and operating costs, and managing its operations over a specific period. Privatization means the divestiture of government ownership in a company’s or service’s property and functions-including all the associated assets and liabilities.


What does the VGF scheme mean in PPP?
Viability Gap Funding or Grant refers to a one-time or deferred grant provided under this scheme with the objective of making a project commercially viable.


What are the eligibility criteria for receiving support under the VGF scheme?
To be eligible for funding under the VGF scheme , a PPP project should meet the following criteria: The project should be implemented (i.e., developed, financed, constructed, maintained, and operated) for the project term by a private sector company selected by the government or a statutory entity through a process of open competitive bidding; provided that in the case of railway projects that are not amenable to operation by a private sector company , the Empowered Committee may relax this eligibility criterion.

The PPP Project should be from one of the following sectors.

  1. Roads and bridges, railways, seaports, airports, inland waterways.
  2. Urban transport, water supply, sewerage, solid waste management and other physical infrastructure in urban areas.
  3. Infrastructure projects in Special Economic Zones and internal infrastructure in National Investment and Manufacturing Zones.
  4. International convention centers and other tourism infrastructure projects.
  5. Capital investment in the creation of modern storage capacity including cold chains and post-harvest storage.
  6. Education, health and skill development, without annuity provision.
  7. Oil/Gas/Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) storage facility (includes city gas distribution network);
  8. Oil and Gas pipelines (includes city gas distribution network);
  9. Irrigation (dams, channels, embankments, etc.);
  10. Telecommunication (Fixed Network) (includes optic fiber/wire/cable networks which provide broadband/internet);
  11. Telecommunication towers.
  12. Terminal markets.
  13. Common infrastructure in agriculture markets; and
  14. Soil testing laboratories.

Why should the government engage with the private sector?

Public-private partnerships are more effective. Innovative government leaders recognize that collaborating with private contractors can enhance operations and services without raising taxes. Private companies have access to better rates and the latest technologies and possess the expertise to effectively comply with environmental regulations while skillfully managing government projects. Public-private partnerships result in improved operations and services for taxpayers at no additional cost.

Don’t private companies cut corners to boost profits?

Governments are increasingly partnering with private contractors so their constituents can benefit from high-quality services without experiencing tax increases . Private-sector partners are more capable of practicing cost efficiencies to minimize expenditures while exploiting additional revenue streams than government entities alone. Private companies can deliver better services for less.

Aren’t private companies less accountable to the public than governments?

The opposite is true. Private companies involved in public-private partnerships are significantly more accountable because they answer not only to the governments that hire them but also to various regulators, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congressional oversight committees, and more. Additionally, their actions are scrutinized by the media. Private companies work diligently to ensure that the public is satisfied with their services and, as a result, are often much more accountable than governments acting independently.


Isn’t there a risk of corruption when private companies are involved in providing public services?

The only way private companies can achieve long-term success in partnering with governments is to insist on quality, value, and dependability in the services they provide. Private companies are held to very high standards when complying with regulatory requirements, so regulatory bodies tend to enforce regulations more strictly with private contractors than they do with government agencies. With this increased oversight, both private companies and government officials are scrutinized and held accountable, which minimizes opportunities for corruption.

What is “traditional” procurement as opposed to a PPP?

In traditional procurement, the government provides detailed specifications and tenders its project to a contractor. The government prepares detailed specifications that describe the needed service. The specifications are then published to obtain the most competitively priced tender.

Once the contract is awarded, the government closely supervises the work carried out by the contractor to ensure compliance. In this way, the government takes responsibility for the design and planning of the project, all legal issues, and any unforeseen costs or emergencies. The government is responsible for the contractor exceeding the budget or making construction errors and has very little control over the timeframe of completion.

When the asset or service becomes operational, the government is responsible for performance. The private sector partner is responsible only for delivering the service according to the contract.

In a PPP, the government outlines the service that is required. Should the PPP option be the preferred method of procurement, the government leaves it to the private sector partner to develop a proposal to meet the required service. The private sector partner will be selected through a bidding process. This approach ensures that projects are driven substantially by the private partner, resulting in greater value for money.

What are PPP Sectors, Contracts and Agreements abbreviations?

ADP PlatformAsian Development Platform
Asia Development Partners
Asian Development Professionals
ADP Capital UK
Aandyal Developments Partners Group
ADP GroupAl-Nahda Development Partners Group
Asia Development Partners Group
African Development Group
ADP-AFAfghanistan Development Partners
Alternative Development Program
ADSCRAnnual Debt Service Cover Ratio
ALOPAdvance Loss of Profit
APPAlianza Publico Privada (Public-Private Partnership)
BBuild
BAFOBest And Final Offer
BoKBody of Knowledge
BOOTBuild-Own-Operate-Transfer
BOTBuild-Operate-Transfer
BRTBus Rapid Transit
BTOBuild-Transfer-Operate
BRICS GroupBrazil, Russia, India China, South Africa including new members
CAConsortium Agreement
CAFCorporación Andina de Fomento (Development Bank of Latin America)
CapexCapital expenditure
CAPMCapital Asset Pricing Model
CBACost-Benefit Analysis
CEACost-Effectiveness Analysis
CFADSCash Flows Available for Debt Service
CICCabinet Infrastructure Committee (New South Wales, Australia)
CJVCooperative Joint Venture
CNDState-owned investment promotion agency that acts as a PPP agency (Uruguay)
CONFISNational Fiscal Council (Colombia)
CONPESNational Council for Economic and Social Policy (Colombia)
CPIConsumer Price Index
CPPSão Paulo Partnerships Corporation (Companhia Paulista de Parcerias) (Brazil)
DBDesign-Build
DBFDesign-Build-Finance
DBJDevelopment Bank of Jamaica
DBFMDesign-Build-Finance-Maintain
DBFODesign-Build-Finance-Operate
DBFOMDesign-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain
DBFORMDesign-Build-Finance-Operate-Rehabilitate-Maintain
DBODesign-Build-Operate
DBOMDesign-Build-Operate-Maintain
D&CDesign and Construction
DRBDispute Resolution Board
DRPDispute Resolution Process
DSCRDebt Service Coverage Ratio
EBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
EBRDEuropean Bank for Reconstruction and Development
ECEuropean Commission
ECAExport Credit Agency
EIAEnvironmental Impact Assessment
ESIAEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessment
EIBEuropean Investment Bank
eIRREconomic Internal Rate of Return
EMDEEmerging Markets and Development Economies
eNPVEconomic Net Present Value
EOIExpression of Interest
EPCEngineering, Procurement and Construction
EPCCEngineering, Procurement and Construction Consortium
EPECEuropean PPP Expertise Centre
ERCExpenditure Review Committee, New South Wales, Australia
ERMEnterprise-Risk-Management
ESAEuropean System of National and Regional Accounts
ESIAEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessment
EUEuropean Union
FDIForeign Direct Investment
FIDICInternational Federation of Consulting Engineers(Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils)
FINFRAInfrastructure Investment Fund
FCFinancial closure
FHWAFederal Highway Administration (US Department of Transportation)
FMFacilities Management or Financial Modelling (depending on the context)
FMCFacilities Management Company
FOIFreedom of Information
FOMINMultilateral Investment Fund (IDB Group)
FONADINFondo Nacional de Infraestructura (National Infrastructure Fund, Mexico).
FOREXForeign Exchange
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles
GDPGross Domestic Product
GPCGlobal Certification Program
HM TreasuryHer Majesty’s Treasury (UK)
HOTHigh Occupancy Toll or Heads of terms (depending on the context)
HSRHigh Speed Rail
IASInternational Accounting Standards
ICCInternational Chamber of Commerce
ICSIDInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
ICTInformation and Communications Technology
IDBInter-American Development Bank
IDCInterest during Construction
IFCInternational Finance Corporation
IFIInternational Financial Institutions
IFRSInternational Financial Reporting Standards
IICInter-American Investment Corporation
IIGFIndonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund
IMFInternational Monetary Fund
INTOSAIInternational Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions
IPOInitial Public Offerings
IPPIndependent Power Producers
IPPPInstitutional PPP
IPRIntellectual Property Rights
IPSASInternational Public Sector Accounting Standards
IRRInternal Rate of Return
IRSInterest Rate Swap
ISOInternational Organization for Standardization
ITInformation Technology
ITPInvitations to propose
ITPDInvitation to participate in the dialogue
ITSFTInvitation to Submit a Final Tender
IUKInfrastructure UK
JVJoint Venture
KPIKey Performance Indicators
LACLatin America and Caribbean
LDLiquidated Damages
LDCLeast Developed Countries
LICLow Income Countries
LLCRLife Loan Coverage Ratio
LoILetter of Intent
LPLimited Partners
LRTLight Rail Transit
MCAMulticriteria Analysis
MDBMultilateral Development Bank
MEATMost Economically Advantageous Tender
MIGAMultilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
MIRRModified Internal Rate of Return
MISManagement Information Systems
M&EMonitoring and Evaluation
MOUMemorandum of Understanding
NAONational Audit Office
NDANon-Disclosure Agreement
NDBNew Development Bank (BRICS Group Bank)
ENBDEmirates National Bank of Dubai
NPVNet Present Value
O&MOperate and maintain
OECDOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development
OJEUOfficial Journal of European Union
OpCoOperating Company
OpexOperating expenditure
PAProcuring Authority
PCGParent company guarantee
PEMProject Evaluation Memo
PLCRProject Life Coverage Ratio
PMOProject Management Office
PBCEProject Bonds Credit Enhancement
PF2Private Finance Initiative (reformed edition, UK)
PFIPrivate Finance Initiative
PIMProject Information Memorandum
PLCRProject Life Coverage Ratio
PSCPublic Sector Comparator
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PFIPublic Finance Initiative
PPIAFPublic-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility
PPIPrivate Participation in Infrastructure
PPIFPublic Participation in International Forums
PPPPublic-Private Partnership
PPPIRCPublic-Private Partnerships Infrastructure Resource Centre
PROINVERSIONPrivate Investment Promotion Agency of Peru
PSCPublic Sector Comparator
PUKPartnerships UK
QCQuality control
QCBSQuality and Cost Based Selection
QMPPQuality Management Project Plan
QMSQuality Management System
RFPRequest For Proposal
RFQRequest for Qualification
ROTRehabilitate-Operate-Maintain
RoWRight of Way
RPIRetail Price Index
SCSteering Committee
SIASocial Impact Assessment
SMARTspecific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time constrained
SDGSustainable Development Goals
SOEState Owned Enterprise
SoQSubmission of Qualification
SoPCStandardization of PFI Contracts (UK)
SPCSpecial Purpose Company
SPVSpecial Purpose Vehicle
TIFIATransportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (US)
TIFUTreasury Infrastructure Finance Unit (UK)
ToRTerms of Reference
TTFTreasury Taskforce (UK)
TWFTime Weighting Factors
UKUnited Kingdom
UNCITRALUnited Nations Commission on International Trade
UNECEUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe
USUnited States
USPUnsolicited Proposals
VATValue-Added Tax
VfMValue for Money
VGFViability Gap Funding
WACCWeighted Average Cost of Capital
WBGWorld Bank Group
WBIWorld Bank Institute
WEFWorld Economic Forum
WWTPWaste Water Treatment Plants